THE Social Security Act and Social Security (Amendments) Act each contain more than 1000 sections, most of which are designed to deny people payments, and many of which are in contradiction to other legislation.
Lottery wins, insurance payments and inheritances, when paid in more than one payment, are not classified as income by the Australian Taxation office, but they are by Centrelink.
Further, Centrelink use income averaging to calculate a fortnightly ‘income’ amount over a 12 month period, a practice which was found to be illegal in the Robodebt court cases.
This affects tens of thousands of people on Centrelink benefits each year.
The legal age for voting is 18, but Centrelink expect parents to support their children until they are 22.
That is, of course, unless the parent is receiving a carer’s payment for a disabled child, in which case Centrelink consider the child an adult at age 16, and carer’s payment is cancelled.
Carers for disabled people are paid about $400 a week to care for people with disabilities, about $10 an hour.
If they decide to supplement this with other work, their carer’s payment is reduced or cancelled.
Centrelink consider their payment to be welfare, whereas it is actually a job.
Taxation law considers each partner in a relationship to be financially independent, as it should be.
However Centrelink considers that if one person in the relationship is working, the benefits of the other partner are reduced or cancelled.
This means the non-working partner is completely dependent on the working partner, and has no financial independence.
The result is domestic violence in the form of economic coercion.
These are just a few of the examples of how Centrelink works against Australia’s most vulnerable, and it is time Human Services Minister, Amanda Rishworth, did her job and amended this legislation.
Craig Hill, Brisbane
